Quote Originally Posted by AbuMaia View Post
I have a question that is probably best saved for later when things are more settled, but the idea of dynamic probe points came to mind. I print a lot of 25mm3 cubes to test my printer when I change something in firmware. It seems to me that for objects like these that have a small printbed footprint, one doesn't need 4x4 probe points, or even 3x3. My question is, is it feasible to have the post-processing script also control the number of probe points along with probed area?
I would guess this makes sense. But just for the sake of discussion.... On a small 25mm 3D-Cube, what would be the right set of points to probe? Maybe a grid with a 100mm on a side with the cube at the center? Would any accuracy be picked up by making the grid either larger or smaller?