Close



Results 1 to 10 of 396

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by dacb View Post
    I decided to keep the (n) parameter to G29 from Roxy and remove the (A) parameter. So an example G29 command could be:
    Code:
    G29 V4 T n3 L95 F95 R105 B105
    Holy Cow! That is great if you merged things that easily! And actually... I have a request. I think 'n' makes sense but because Repetier can't tolerate either n or N and Pronterface can't use a capital N, we need to accommodate something else. I'll look at the merge (and re-read these posts in detail) in the morning, but I already added :

    if ( code_seen('n') || code_seen('U') || code_seen('u') ) {
    n_points = code_value();
    if (n_points<2 || n_points>AUTO_BED_LEVELING_GRID_POINTS ) {
    SERIAL_PROTOCOLPGM("?Number of probed points not plausable.\n");
    break;
    }
    }

    to my code base to help with a transition. Can we fold that into the merge? I was thinking an upside down 'N' would be easy to remember if you are using broken software that can't tolerate an 'N'.
    Last edited by Roxy; 09-26-2014 at 01:21 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •