Close



Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Student
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    14

    .SCAD format to .STL

    Anybody know of an open source tool to convert a .SCAD file to a .STL file?

  2. #2
    Technician
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    67
    I'm not sure if this helps. Do you have OpenSCAD?
    I got thist at: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCA...ort_and_Export
    STL Export

    To export your design, select "Export as STL..." from the "Design" menu, then enter a filename in the ensuing dialog box. Don't forget to add the ".stl" extension.Trouble shooting:After compile and render GCAL (F6), you may see that your design is simple: no. That's bad news.See line 8 in the following output from OpenSCAD 2010.02:Parsing design (AST generation)...
    Compiling design (CSG Tree generation)...
    Compilation finished.
    Rendering Polygon Mesh using CGAL...
    Number of vertices currently in CGAL cache: 732
    Number of objects currently in CGAL cache: 12
    Top level object is a 3D object:
    Simple: no <*****************
    Valid: yes
    Vertices: 22
    Halfedges: 70
    Edges: 35
    Halffacets: 32
    Facets: 16
    Volumes: 2
    Total rendering time: 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
    Rendering finished.


    When you try to export this to .STL you will get a message like:Object isn't a valid 2-manifold! Modify your design..


    "Manifold" means that it is "water tight" and that there are no holes in the geometry. In a valid 2-manifold each edge must connect exactly two facets. That means that the program must be able to connect a face with an object. E.g. if you use a cube of height 10 to carve out something from a wider cube of height 10, it is not clear to which cube the top or the bottom belongs. So make the small extracting cube a bit "longer" (or "shorter"):difference() {
    // original
    cube (size = [2,2,2]);
    // object that carves out
    # translate ([0.5,0.5,-0.5]) {
    cube (size = [1,1,3]);
    }
    }


    Correct use of difference

    Here is a more tricky little example taken from the OpenSCAD Forum (retrieved 15:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)):module example1() {
    cube([20, 20, 20]);
    translate([-20, -20, 0]) cube([20, 20, 20]);
    cube([50, 50, 5], center = true);
    }
    module example2() {
    cube([20.1, 20.1, 20]);
    translate([-20, -20, 0]) cube([20.1, 20.1, 20]);
    cube([50, 50, 5], center = true);
    }


    Example1 would render like this:
    A not valid 2-manifold cube (simple = no)

    The example1 module is not a valid 2-manifold because both cubes are sharing one edge. They touch each other but do not intersect.Example2 is a valid 2-manifold because there is an intersection. Now the construct meets the 2-manifold constraint stipulating that each edge must connect exactly two facets.Pieces you are subtracting must extend past the original part. (OpenSCAD Tip: Manifold Space and Time, retrieved 18:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)).For reference, another situation that causes the design to be non-exportable is when two faces that are each the result of a subtraction touch. Then the error message comes up.difference () {
    cube ([20,10,10]);
    translate ([10,0,0]) cube (10);
    }
    difference () {
    cube ([20,10,10]);
    cube (10);
    }


    simply touching surfaces is correctly handled.translate ([10,0,0]) cube (10);
    cube (10);


  3. #3
    Student
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    14
    Cool, thanks!! Openscad did the trick for me. I had to plug in some variables for the .SCAD drawing which then rendered the models that I was after.

  4. #4
    @sparkdaddychad

    http://www.Libre3D.com converts SCAD (Solid CAD) files to STL when uploaded. Then anyone can download the SCAD or STL

    Libre3D.com is for Open Source and Free 3D models

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •