Prusa does boast a lot of innovations, and I agree that they aren't always the full solution or they're solving a problem that shouldn't be there. Prusa's solution to adhesion (? not entirely sure what the motivation was here, adhesion or print surface damage) is a powder coated PEI bed. I imagine the surface roughness helps things stick.

As for z offset adjustment, I think the ultimakers do a great job of this and have the best system for "calibrating" a probe that isn't the nozzle itself. They run the nozzle straight into the bed and monitor for the point where the readings stop changing, i.e. it's hit the bed and the bed is no longer getting closer. The compliance of the leveling springs dampens the impact but the print surface might get damaged. For the ultimakers that use glass the print surface wont suffer, but PEI might. Getting the starting z level correct is very important to making sure prints stay stuck, and can be hard to do with an offset probe like on the mk2.

I think one of the simplest and best ways to help a print stay stuck is to not shake the bed back and forth, my little jab at the mendel style printers.

Back to the filament sensor thing. I think they should have tried using the trinamic drivers to detect the extruder motor stalling for jam detection. I imagine they could have incorporated some kind of dog clutch that causes the extruder gears to bind when there's no filament feeding through and detect run out filament that way. Adding the extra sensor only makes sense to me if it helps you calibrate/track exactly how much filament is being fed through like a servo. But as far as I understand it only detects presence and movement, not exactly how much movement.