Results 1 to 10 of 12
Hybrid View
-
04-06-2014, 07:02 PM #1
3D Printed Homes May Lead to No More Homeless People in the US
This is a very good piece written by Alan Gardener at 3dPrint.com. He discovers that if the United States Government set aside just 15 days worth of interest payments on their national debt, that they could construct homes for every single homeless person is the nation. Pretty incredible idea for sure. The idea utilizes cheap concrete 3D printing technology that the Chinese are already using to construct homes for those unable to afford traditional houses.
http://3dprint.com/2040/3d-print-hom...-homelessness/
What are your thoughts? Is something like this feasible? It's remarkable how little such a project would add to our already high national debt.
-
04-06-2014, 09:25 PM #2
Theoretically it would be possible to construct a 3D printed house (or a conventionally built house) for every homeless person by throwing money at that part of the problem. However you have to overcome big social constraints.
Firstly, where are you going to get the open space upon which to erect these houses? You couldn't find it in Brooklyn.
Secondly, the people themselves would be reluctant to move from their "homelands" to these "communities for the previously homeless". If you asked a homeless person from New York what they consider themselves to be and I'd bet they would say, "I'm a New Yorker". That's their homeland, in the same way as a Navajo from Arizona is likely to say that is where their homeland is. People don't like to be moved from their homelands even if it means satisfying some of Life's necessities.
There is a third problem which has been experienced in areas established for the particular socio-economic classes. If you pile them into an area, the area gets a reputation which feeds certain types of social behaviour. This applies to the filthy rich; the well-to-do middle classes; blue-collar workers as well as the poor. If you are considering the homeless, unfortunately, putting poor people all together and branding the area they live in as "below acceptable standard" then you are putting these people behind the eight ball from the start.
Sure. Use money to 3D print housing, but plan for the social consequences that will follow.
Old Man EmuLast edited by old man emu; 04-07-2014 at 08:13 AM.
-
05-26-2014, 10:22 AM #3
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 35
-
04-07-2014, 06:58 AM #4
You also must calculate all the other expenses of owning a home, furnishing the home, using electricity, plumbing, etc. Is the government going to pay all these people to sit on their butts in their free homes?
-
04-07-2014, 08:05 AM #5
Plus, sadly, we probably have enough foreclosed-on houses in America, sitting empty and depreciating, to house the homeless already.
-
04-07-2014, 09:03 AM #6
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Saskatchewan, Canada
- Posts
- 294
Far more than enough actually. There are enough vacant houses in the USA for every homeless person in the USA to have 22 houses.
-
05-26-2014, 10:11 AM #7
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 35
some places but not the US
For most of the US, people don't actually "own" homes. Rented, via property tax payments. No payment, no ownership. You don't actually have any "right" to be anywhere in the US, unless someone is being paid. Think about it.
Would work for other parts of the world though.
-
05-26-2014, 03:03 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- Oakland, CA
- Posts
- 935
The concrete house shell itself is the least part of it. I'm sure these structures would not meet current uniform building codes, which are written to ensure a high minimum standard of housing. If the US allowed squatting or shanty-towns, like many other countries do, then the homeless would find or build their own shelters and that problem would be solved. Of course, these places have other problems, like sanitation - I doubt that indoor plumbing is printed into these Chinese "houses".
Homeless people live primarily in large urban areas because it's possible (although not easy) to survive on the streets there. In an unincorporated rural area where the land is cheap enough and regulations are lax enough for this sort of thing to be conceivable, there would be nobody to beg from but other destitute people, and recyclables would be scarce, as well as other services and resources that the homeless depend on. Anybody put there might have housing, but they'd have little else unless it was provided.
The Chinese require expensive and difficult-to-get residency permits from people wanting to live in their larger cities, and tend to forcibly displace people from their rural habitations to make room for real-estate developments. These 3D-printed concrete sheds might be where they'll end up putting them, and they'll have little choice but to live there. But I don't see this as a solution for homelessness in the USA, unless things change a lot here.
Andrew Werby
www.computersculpture.com
-
05-27-2014, 09:21 AM #9
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Saskatchewan, Canada
- Posts
- 294
-
05-27-2014, 12:50 PM #10
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 35
Have you been to NYC? It smells like a toilet. In the subways, on the streets. It already has a sanitation problem. So 3D shelters will not solve nor "create" that problem.
Qidi X Plus 3 Paper thin first...
05-27-2024, 01:15 AM in General 3D Printing Discussion