Scaling problem with slicer software

[TFilbert]

First post! I am new to 3d printing at home, My wife bought me an I-mate S for Christmas, and I'm using the QIDI slicer software that came with the printer. Upon installation of the slicer software, I was immediately prompted to download the newest version, which I think is 5.6.12? My problem:The QIDI slicer software is not properly scaling my parts. I intend to use this to print precision tolerance parts for prototyping purposes prior to having parts milled or laser cut out of steel. So If I model a part to the thousandth of an inch, I need the print to come out to the thousandth of an inch.To test print and learn the software, I created a 2" diameter x 7" tall cylinder with .125" wall thickness. The part was modeled in AutoCAD "Inventor" software, since that's what I have available at work. I exported the part in several formats not being sure what the slicer software will be happy with. When I open the part in the QIDI slicer, each file type opened up at a different size. None seemed to keep the original dimensions. I noticed that the part loaded with metric dimensions and not inches. I found a button to click that said "Scale inches to MM" When I clicked that, the part exploded and went from way too small to way too big. All the manuals and instructions are very poorly translated to English and offer very little help.What is the secret to modeling a precise part, and opening it in the slicer software so that it maintains the precise dimensions? Picture 1 shows how the part imports at different sizes based on file type. one is .stl the other is "3d part file" (I can't see the extension type) Both file types were exported from Inventor from the same part model.Picture 2 shows how the dimensions seem random. it says 5mm x 5mm x 18.08mm (Keep in mind, it was modeled to be a 2" diameter, 7" tall cylinder.)Picture 3 shows what happens when I click "Scale inches to mm" and it blows up so big it wont fit in the print space.What gives!? How do I print exactly the size I modeled without having to do guess n check work?!

[TFilbert]

Nobody has any input? Am I in unchartered territory?

[fred_dot_u]

Even though I have a QIDI X-Max, I don't use their slicer, which I understand is based on Cura's program. For 3D printing, one uses .STL format files, which are unit-less, but defaults to millimeter. It's always safer to build your models in millimeters.

7" is 177.8 mm, which is "close" to the 18.08 number you've referenced but not close enough for me to think it's a decimal point error. Same thing with your 5 mm reference, as 2" is 50.8 mm, although that's somewhat closer to a decimal point shift.

Consider to attach your STL file for others (including myself) to examine, process and expound.

[TFilbert]

Thanks for the input. It could be the wall thickness of the bottom of the cylinder, which I think I modeled at 1/8" 7.125 = 180.975mm But, What I don't understand is why the shift at all in the decimal? The dimensions in the photograph are the dimensions the part imported with, which shows mm, not cm. If it was in cm I would have been less confused. And I didn't understand what was happening when I "scaled inches to mm" and the part exploded in size. What slicer program should I look into? I wasn't sure if I could use any slicer, or if I need to use theirs because it's modeled for the print bed/space of their printer.Attached is the .stl

[fred_dot_u]

Thanks for posting the file. The cylinder imports as 5.08 mm diameter, off by a factor of ten. This points to the creation/export aspect of the program. It also presents as 181 mm tall, but that's the overall height/length. This also points to the creation/export. I'm unfamiliar with Inventor and therefore cannot offer hints.

I don't think it's your slicer, as three programs I've used to check the dimensions all agree. Is a step file (.STP) an option for your export? I suspect the results could be the same. Perhaps there's a settings reference within the program to make appropriate adjustments?

On another note (G-Flat, F-Sharp, etc.), you'll be surprised at the work involved to get the tolerances you've described in your post. Layer thickness on a filament printer can get as low as 0.100 mm. My math says 1 mm = 40 thousands approximately, 1/10 mm comes to about four thousandths. That's in the Z-direction, X and Y get a lot looser, depending on the tuning of the machine. Add elephant's foot to the equation, or maybe a bit of post processing and you'll have your hands full.

Even in resin printers, with a 0.050 layer capability (default in most cases), the X/Y is dependent on tuning the exposures for a specific resin. It appears that you have sufficient motivation to pursue tuning to the point of meeting your requirements, and I applaud that attitude, if true.

I purchased a license for Simplify3D and wish I had pursued other options in my slicer choice, but it's been working for me. I'm transitioning to PrusaSlicer lately, as they've improved the interface and ease of use by a huge factor. Their instructional videos are fast paced, but quite clear and easy to understand. You aren't so deep into the muck with your existing slicer that you'd have to re-learn too much. Getting a printer profile tuned for your machine, if it's not available, would present the bigger challenge.

I'd love to have a profile in PrusaSlicer for my BCN3D Sigma R16 IDEX, especially with the multi-color support in PrusaSlicer as it is now.

Spend a couple dollars for Maker's Muse Clearance and Tolerance test model which will allow you to determine (and improve?) your printers capability, specifically in the X/Y direction.

If you are experienced with Inventor, it's a bit of a stretch to move to another creation program. I understand that the workflow for Inventor and SolidWorks is quite different from that for Onshape, Fusion360, etc. If you have a logical mind between your ears and are comfortable with a bit of coding, check out OpenSCAD. It's a text programming package that works great parametrically and is virtually made for things like your model. Plus, it's free and multi-platform

[TFilbert]

Well, I agree, I'm being ambitious when I say .001" tolerance. I think I'd be happy with .01 tolerance honestly. Possibly even .05 I'm not going to be prototyping engine pieces. Mostly mounting brackets and whatnot.

I have experience with solidworks and inventor, but I'm not a pro at either one. I can do some basic stuff, but I'm not at the level of being able to model intricate, complicated parts. I would like to find a solid 3d modeling program that's similar to inventor or solidworks for use at home, that's not super expensive. Solidworks was what I used at school, and autodesk inventor is what my employer has available.

I'm new to 3d printing at home. Previously I would just email the stl file to a tech center and they would print it for me. I will have to learn a lot about tuning. I didn't realize there were things you could do to tune/adjust the tolerance capability of the printer. I'm more familiar with things like encoders/servo motors which there's not really any "tuning" to do with them. you install the servo/encoder into the robot joint and plug it into the wire harness.

I'd upload the step file, but it's rejecting as an invalid file type

[curious aardvark]

try exporting the model using millimetres.
Inventor will do that.

Almost no current software is particularly happy with inches.
Pretty much only used in the united states and most software is written elsewhere.

Some slicers do offer the ability to change the default settings to inches, but then it'll probably just confuse the printer as that only works in millimetres.

You can keep mucking about with inches, but you'll find life a lot easier if you just use millimetres for 3d printing.

[fred_dot_u]

For not-super-expensive, you can't go wrong the hobbyist version of Fusion 360. It's a one year subscription, free although it has to be renewed each year. There's tons of features in the free version and at least that many tons of tutorials how to use it. Product Design Online is a YouTube creator with a great series of tutorials, easy to follow, really clear to understand.

With respect to the difficulty with the file, usually turning it into a zip file will let it squeak by the filtes.

I agree with the curious aardvark about doing the work in millimeters. The math is so much easier and the programs behave far better.

[TFilbert]

Thanks. I'll look into the fusion 360.I created a new part (something to hopefully print a little faster and use less material. a 1" square cube to do some test printing with. I created it in inches, then converted the document to metric. I'll give these a try tonight when I get home.

[TFilbert]

inches cube