Close



Results 1 to 10 of 57

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Engineer-in-Training
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    255
    Hi

    I would certainly encourage folding UBL back into the main branch. I have a cartesian printer so that may bias my recommendation.

    Bob

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by uncle_bob View Post
    Hi

    I would certainly encourage folding UBL back into the main branch. I have a cartesian printer so that may bias my recommendation.

    Bob
    This hasn't been discussed lately (in the last few months). But the plan was to get RC8 promoted to 'Stable' and then no more features would be added to it. Only bug fixes. And at that time, the plan was to then make the UBL branch the main Development Branch and use that to absorb any new features to the code base. Eventually... (maybe in 6 months???) it would start a Release Candidate phase and that would ultimately result in a new 'Stable' branch.

    The big problem with 'folding' UBL back into the main branch is the other bed leveling schemes would disappear. UBL pretty replaces the existing code and feature set. So it is probably less controversial to just let it evolve on its own until there is no argument that it handles every case.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •