Close



Results 1 to 10 of 41

Threaded View

  1. #20
    Super Moderator Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,824
    Add Geoff on Thingiverse
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Ross View Post
    Interesting and simple design. The legal disclaimer seems ingenuous. I think that the designer thinks he has a workable product. 3D printing was essential to the design, but appears unnecessary if some manufacturer picks up on it. So be it. There is no need to add complication. 3 points regarding the comments at the end. 1st, boiling is an effective means of sterilization, readily available to everyone. 2nd, insertion could be performed by doctors or by trained midwives. 3rd, open source design prevents profit gouging by patent holders. The liability issue is no worse than for any other IUD design. This is an example of 3D printing living up to its initial promise.
    "I think that the designer thinks he has a workable product. 3D printing was essential to the design, but appears unnecessary "

    **editing my post.
    I think Dan, you summed up my feelings in that sentence, and simultaneously proved alot of peoples arguments here
    Last edited by Geoff; 10-07-2014 at 08:27 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •