Close



Results 1 to 10 of 757

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Originally I was using 2x2, but generally I've been using 3x3. For the examples above in my original post and further testing I've been doing over the last couple of days I've been using 5 x 5. They all seem to give the same results in the same places.

    Here are the results of the M48. I did the 4 corners of my probing square, plus the centre:

    M48 x32 y23
    RECEIVED: Mean: 2.164063
    RECEIVED: Standard Deviation: 0.002223
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: ok
    SENT: M105
    SENT: M105
    RECEIVED: echo:endstops hit: Z:2.16
    endstops hit: Z:2.16

    M48 x262 y23
    RECEIVED: Mean: 3.819562
    RECEIVED: Standard Deviation: 0.001582
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: ok
    SENT: M105
    SENT: M105
    RECEIVED: echo:endstops hit: Z:3.82
    endstops hit: Z:3.82

    M48 x262 y253
    RECEIVED: Mean: 3.848125
    RECEIVED: Standard Deviation: 0.001452
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: ok
    SENT: M105
    SENT: M105
    SENT: M105
    RECEIVED: echo:endstops hit: Z:3.85
    endstops hit: Z:3.85

    M48 x32 y253
    RECEIVED: Mean: 1.183125
    RECEIVED: Standard Deviation: 0.001768
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: ok
    SENT: M105
    SENT: M105
    RECEIVED: echo:endstops hit: Z:1.18
    endstops hit: Z:1.18


    M48 x149 y172 (X/Y Safe Home Position - Centre of Bed)
    RECEIVED: Mean: 2.000750
    RECEIVED: Standard Deviation: 0.002634
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: ok
    SENT: M105
    RECEIVED: echo:endstops hit: Z:2.00
    endstops hit: Z:2.00

    Thanks again for your time looking at this.
    Last edited by Astek777; 08-14-2015 at 03:50 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •