Close



Results 1 to 10 of 41

Threaded View

  1. #19
    Student
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    Interesting and simple design. The legal disclaimer seems disingenuous. I think that the designer thinks he has a workable product. 3D printing was essential to the design, but appears unnecessary if some manufacturer picks up on it. So be it. There is no need to add complication. 3 points regarding the comments at the end. 1st, boiling is an effective means of sterilization, readily available to everyone. 2nd, insertion could be performed by doctors or by trained midwives. 3rd, open source design prevents profit gouging by patent holders. The liability issue is no worse than for any other IUD design. This is an example of 3D printing living up to its initial promise.
    Last edited by Daniel Ross; 10-07-2014 at 09:38 AM. Reason: nonword -> word

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •