Close



Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Print sizes?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Technician
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    nsw australia
    Posts
    81
    designerrants, the time is due to the relative volumes of the drop and container, and from the available info (btw I have paid to be a beta tester, but not a peep or beta received yet so STILL working in theory) the drop rate is adjustable and apparently on TINY (approx size in photos suggests 2-3mm/side and 20mm high in 20 minutes) objects each layer takes about 4 seconds, but with 1000+ layers per mm of z axis the estimate of duration can be left to the designer of the object (btw 25.4mm to the inch) and larger area builds will probably take longer per layer to give sufficient curing energy at the points to be cured in the liquid resin. and I CAN fire even nastier shots than vanguard's minor warning shot and I usually aim for total annilation of the target.
    the peachy printer uses a UV LASER to cure LIQUID resin that floats on top of salt water and does NOT extrude anything other than UV light. (idiots - please point the laser at your eyes, all others - do NOT do the request for idiots)

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by harpo99999 View Post
    the peachy printer uses a UV LASER to cure LIQUID resin that floats on top of salt water and does NOT extrude anything other than UV light.
    I actually understand this point quite well, as should anyone without severe cognitive disability who watched the kickstarter video for the Peachy printer. I made the slight mistake of substituting the word "extrude" for the word "print" - probably because I use SolidWorks (and other professional 3D modeling software suites) on a near daily basis, and to model "features" that would result in the geometry necessary to build a column in a Peachy printer, that would be considered an "extruded boss". This is not a big deal and should not have been the apparent giant ass-chapping sticking point that it turned out to be.

    Anyone who can only quibble over the definition of words when their meanings in context are clear, yet not attempt to answer the question(s) asked, is not being helpful, and therefore should at least not be a "moderator" of a help forum.

    But I appreciate that you, harpo99999, have at least provided information and some help relevant to my questions. And, since everyone wants to quibble over definitions, keep in mind that UV light photons are not "extruded", but emitted.

  3. #3
    Technologist Vanguard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Posts
    110

    DesignerRants

    You certainly have a way with words, quite eloquent, and convincing. I am sure you are diplomat material. You complain about the way I have used the forum in a way that does not convey information, and then proceed to use two post to do so yourself. You definitely have picked a deserving name with "Rants" portion. Continue.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Vanguard View Post
    You certainly have a way with words, quite eloquent, and convincing. I am sure you are diplomat material. You complain about the way I have used the forum in a way that does not convey information, and then proceed to use two post to do so yourself. You definitely have picked a deserving name with "Rants" portion. Continue.
    My complaint was that your post "Does not convey information"? No. That's a twisted premise. I pointed out how only a pathetic "moderator" would answer a QUESTION with a petty quibble on the definition of a word taken out of context, and then offer no relevant information to help answer the question asked.

    My last 2 posts were not replies to questions. Further, I'm not trying to set the (hopefully high) leadership standards of a Moderator's position on a help forum - even if you're merely an unpaid volunteer. Again, I hope you're the exception to the rule of who qualifies as a "Moderator" on this site. Next time you're about to reply to a posted question, ask yourself: "Am I here to help facilitate a forum and membership, or to try to belittle and lecture participants because of personal hangups?"

  5. #5
    Technologist Vanguard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Posts
    110
    This entire exchange should be a thread on it's own. I would like to say, I was not the one that rudely attacked a person as an "asswipe" btw; that would be ass-wipe. You have repeatedly used foul language in attacking me, very uncalled for, and makes you look like a very uneducated person. If not uneducated, unwise. You cannot communicate, your ideas are minimal, you have problem. I would NOT want to work any where that you worked, or be a service person at any food joint you visited. You are out of line. I have been polite, and yet you continue to attack me over what was an informative post. Your POV is warped as are you.

    If you wish to continue to look like a fool, I am very willing to go along.

    BTW; it has been discussed with in the staff, you are being laughed at, you cannot even spell, it should never have gone to this, since it was a minor comment, that YOU have pursued, and pursued, all the while attacking me in a childish manner !

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Vanguard View Post
    This entire exchange should be a thread on it's own. I would like to say, I was not the one that rudely attacked a person as an "asswipe" btw; that would be ass-wipe. You have repeatedly used foul language in attacking me, very uncalled for, and makes you look like a very uneducated person. If not uneducated, unwise. You cannot communicate, your ideas are minimal, you have problem. I would NOT want to work any where that you worked, or be a service person at any food joint you visited. You are out of line. I have been polite, and yet you continue to attack me over what was an informative post. Your POV is warped as are you.

    If you wish to continue to look like a fool, I am very willing to go along.

    BTW; it has been discussed with in the staff, you are being laughed at, you cannot even spell, it should never have gone to this, since it was a minor comment, that YOU have pursued, and pursued, all the while attacking me in a childish manner !
    You're a psycho.

  7. #7
    Technologist Vanguard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Posts
    110
    I think you have made my point for me.

    In the battle of wits, you are unarmed.



    From Kingoddball: Is this needed? Why bother?
    Last edited by Kingoddball; 12-08-2013 at 03:38 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •