Close



Results 1 to 4 of 4

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    the creatr 3 v2 is an idex system - so for me that's a no brainer, I'd get that one. Also a very good size print volume for an enxlosed machine.

    300c hotend and 120c plate - so will be able to handle polycarbonate, goth food safe and super strong and durable.

    If you want a dual extruder and can afford an IDEX system - then there really isn''t any argument as far as I am concerned - you go IDEX.

    Leveling wise it covers ALL the options. Manual levelling so you can make it as flat as you like. But also induction sensors for mesh levelling and height sensing.

    As far as slicers go - I've never managed to get simplify3d to succesfully do dual extrusion. I actually use Flashforges flashprint for that on my dual extruder rep clone machine.
    Sooo much easier.
    Looks like they've gone for a propriatary code format anway, so you have to use flashprint - but, that really isn't an issue. It is a really good slicer.

    You even have a temperature controlled build chamber, and that's not as common as you'd think. Even the leapfrog bolt (my favourite enclosed idex printer) just has heated, not thermostatically controlled build chamber.
    Got to say, the creator 3 v2 - while expensive, is a very decent looking piece of kit. And looking at the improvements and features - not to mention 300x250x200 build volume - it's a good buy.
    Last edited by curious aardvark; 02-17-2020 at 05:57 AM.

  2. #2
    I thank you for that quick and comprehensive reply, even added coverage of things of which I had not thought. I am trying to anticipate problems this time, hence these questions.

    I mainly anticipate the dual extruders to be used to have a separate extruder for support, but having just watched some videos of the dual heads working independently to double work flow, I can see the benefits. Quite amazing. I was forced to used Simplify3D to get access to a larger nozzle size of 0.6mm to suit the T-glase. That was easy with my old Leapfrog, more challenging with the Makerbot with models 14cm square and highly detailed. The ability to produce two at once back then would have been great. I can see windows opening.

    My concern is my lack of familiarity with that surface, compared to glass and hairspray.

    My queries have already revealed the vast array of new filaments, it is a whole new world compared to my early days. I may need a filament cabinet as well.

    Thanks again
    Bob

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •