Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
You're going a very long way round.
Funny you should say that, because we are starting to come to the same conclusion.

The idea was that the printing itself would be the "long pole in the tent", and in the cases where we need to make multiple copies of a given piece, or spoilage downstream forces a re-work, we wanted to be able to re-make it without having to re-print.

The more we learn, the faster that assumption is going away.

Thanks to all for the feedback. We'll keep this updated as progress continues.