Close



Results 1 to 10 of 12

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Engineer-in-Training
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    241
    That doesn't look that great, did you have to run a calibration before using the new software ?
    I am always very hesitant to update software that already works great, especially on Win, where I'm no so familiar with

  2. #2
    Technologist
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    124
    Yeah, you always have to calibrate when you install a new version as you have to uninstall the previous version.
    One thing I noticed was the alignment was a bit off so I might try calibrating again to see if I can get better alignment.
    I can't really see too many new features in this version so if the scan quality doesn't improve I'll be going bck to 2.3.

  3. #3
    Technologist
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    124
    Well, much to my embarrassment, I've just realised I made a big cock-up with my first test of this new version.
    The picture I earlier, which was lower quality, was in fact a 3d print of the original injection molded model which I scanned then printed, doh !
    So the scan quality was always going to be worse with the printed model.
    Please ignore my post (which I've deleted) about the quality of v2.5 until I've tested it further and apologies for any confusion.
    Last edited by scobo; 08-13-2017 at 11:38 AM.

  4. #4
    Technologist
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    124
    Ok, after scanning another couple of objects, I'm happy that the quality is at least as good as previous versions and 2.5 seems to be working fine.
    Still haven't noticed a great deal of difference to 2.3.3 though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •