Close



Page 55 of 65 FirstFirst ... 5455354555657 ... LastLast
Results 541 to 550 of 757

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I still do not get repetier show me the values that appear on the LCD. Using the command G28, G29 and then again G28.
    When It finish I get this result:

    In the LCD: x: 142.0 Y: 47.0 and z: +11.8
    In Repetier-Host: x:0 y:0 z:0

    Log of Repetier-Host:
    10:11:53.485 : Base x: 30.00 y: 30.00 z: 11.67
    10:12:04.516 : Base x: 140.00 y: 30.00 z: 12.19
    10:12:15.985 : Base x: 140.00 y: 140.00 z: 11.81
    10:12:27.548 : Base x: 30.00 y: 140.00 z: 11.21
    10:12:27.548 : Eqn coefficients: a: 0.01 b: -0.00 d: 11.61
    10:12:27.548 : planeNormal x: -0.01 y: 0.00 z: 1.00

    Is there any way or G code that allows me to pass the printer values to Repetier?

    And another thing I do not understand is that when I ran the G29 command after the G28, the servo arm does not go down first and then the carriage moves to the position of the first measuring point.

  2. #2
    Technologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    114
    Did you do an M114 in repetier and see where it thinks the machine is.
    Make sure the bed size is correct and the home position too.






    Quote Originally Posted by Deividmaxx View Post
    I still do not get repetier show me the values that appear on the LCD. Using the command G28, G29 and then again G28.
    When It finish I get this result:

    In the LCD: x: 142.0 Y: 47.0 and z: +11.8
    In Repetier-Host: x:0 y:0 z:0

    Log of Repetier-Host:
    10:11:53.485 : Base x: 30.00 y: 30.00 z: 11.67
    10:12:04.516 : Base x: 140.00 y: 30.00 z: 12.19
    10:12:15.985 : Base x: 140.00 y: 140.00 z: 11.81
    10:12:27.548 : Base x: 30.00 y: 140.00 z: 11.21
    10:12:27.548 : Eqn coefficients: a: 0.01 b: -0.00 d: 11.61
    10:12:27.548 : planeNormal x: -0.01 y: 0.00 z: 1.00

    Is there any way or G code that allows me to pass the printer values to Repetier?

    And another thing I do not understand is that when I ran the G29 command after the G28, the servo arm does not go down first and then the carriage moves to the position of the first measuring point.

  3. #3
    Thanks very much for your help. With that I can work and get the auto leveling operate as I want. With this and more G codes I can fix several bugs like the Repetier values and the problem that the arm does not move down before the first point to when executing the G29.

    But I just found another bug I think. It happens when I heat the second extruder to achieve a certain temperature. Once the extruder reaches the temperature, the heater is turned on and off to keep that temperature. When this occurs the servo starts shaking consuming much power to the RAMPS.

    At first it work well connecting the 5V and VCC pins. But the servo shaking and my printer restart.
    So I have powered the servo pins with a LM7805 and keeps happenig. I've also changed the pin D11 to D6 pin with the same results.


    I do not know if there is aa bug on Marlin or it´s a problem with my RAMPS.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    That doesn't sound good! But for sure, lots of people are using RAMPS boards with Auto Bed Leveling. Something simple is wrong.

  5. #5
    I think that this is a bug of marlin.
    I have reviewed all the connections, I have even taken the Ramps and I reviewed the board. Everything works fine.


    Servo vibrations seem to engage the pwm output used with extruder to maintain the temperature. Watching the LED that indicates that the extruder is warming, flashing agrees with the vibrations of servo.


    I have tried using the PROBE_SERVO_DEACTIVATION_DELAY function, but something worse happens. The servo is lowered to the measurement position and vibrate.


    I'm trying to find some other way to turn off or remove power from the servo once no longer needed.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by Deividmaxx View Post
    I think that this is a bug of marlin.
    I have reviewed all the connections, I have even taken the Ramps and I reviewed the board. Everything works fine.


    Servo vibrations seem to engage the pwm output used with extruder to maintain the temperature. Watching the LED that indicates that the extruder is warming, flashing agrees with the vibrations of servo.
    Are you using the BeckDac flavor of Marlin? If not, can you try moving to it? Nobody has seen this behavior with the BeckDac version. If you still see this strange behavior with BeckDac, it will be easier to help you because that is the code I am running right now.

  7. #7
    Student
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    13
    Hello all. I've been printing, off and on, for a couple of years. However, my prints were hit and miss. Sometimes perfect, sometimes not so much. Lot's of time and filament wasted.
    I am now in the process of getting my printer just right. Mechanical problems have plagued me, mostly from lack of experience. But, I am solving them one by one. I think this beckdac will help me, but I need some 101 guidance on exactly how to make the change. Here's what I'm thinking.
    Download beckdac and unzip.
    Load files into arduino.
    Copy old configh file.
    Delete new configh file from beckdac.
    Paste my old configh into beckdac.
    Will that work?

    Thanks to all that respond. I really appreciate it a LOT!

    Bob Keyes

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    I'm thinking.
    Download beckdac and unzip.
    Load files into arduino.
    Copy old configh file.
    Delete new configh file from beckdac.
    Paste my old configh into beckdac.
    Will that work?
    I would suggest getting Arduino to compile the BeckDac release clean with no errors as a starting point. Make sure you can do that with your board set in Tools/Boards. Then, I would use a difference program to compare the two Configuration.h files, and cross over the important settings.

    I would not just copy the old file and replace the new file because you are going to break other stuff that has to be there. Unfortunately, you need to go through line by line and cross over the changes. But a good visual diff program will make that just a 5 or 10 minute nuisance.

  9. #9

    Trying to keep a level-head!

    Hey Roxy

    Just wondered whether you could shed any light on a problem I'm having with auto levelling on a Lulzbot Taz 5 (Rambo 1.3). It's sooooo close to working!!

    I built a small capacitive sensor circuit which I installed and replaced my old, static z endstop with. I then installed and configure the BeckDac firmware as recommend (from page 48ish).

    I seem to be getting very accurate, repeatable results with the sensor, however, whenever I print the levelling seems too close towards the front-left (closest X0, Y0) and then, if anything, too high towards front-right. The Z-Axis is moving though, so it's obviously trying to compensate.

    I do have a glass print bed, and there were suggestions the sensor might not be reading correctly, so I am no printing on a sheet on aluminium but results remain the same.

    Here's the calibration piece I'm trying to print:

    Test Print.jpg


    My start code is:

    G28 ; home all axes
    G29 n5 ; auto level bed

    If I run 'G28 ; G29 V4 T n5' I get this:

    ******* FIRST RUN ********
    RECEIVED: Eqn coefficients: a: 0.01 b: -0.00 d: 0.89
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: Bed Height Topography:
    RECEIVED: --1.61390 --0.90640 --0.21327 +0.44360 +0.99610
    RECEIVED: --1.32577 --0.66765 --0.06640 +0.48798 +0.97235
    RECEIVED: --1.07202 --0.44702 +0.06423 +0.53923 +0.94985
    RECEIVED: --0.85202 --0.27327 +0.18798 +0.61548 +0.99423
    RECEIVED: --0.67702 --0.14577 +0.26923 +0.70360 +1.03673
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: planeNormal x: -0.01 y: 0.00 z: 1.00
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: Bed Level Correction Matrix:
    RECEIVED: 0.999958 0.000000 0.009196
    RECEIVED: 0.000020 0.999998 -0.002187
    RECEIVED: -0.009196 0.002187 0.999955
    RECEIVED: ok

    ******* SECOND RUN ********
    RECEIVED: Eqn coefficients: a: 0.01 b: -0.00 d: 0.88
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: Bed Height Topography:
    RECEIVED: --1.61460 --0.90898 --0.22023 +0.44415 +1.00790
    RECEIVED: --1.33210 --0.67273 --0.06773 +0.48540 +0.97602
    RECEIVED: --1.07460 --0.45835 +0.06727 +0.54352 +0.95040
    RECEIVED: --0.84960 --0.27273 +0.19102 +0.61477 +1.00227
    RECEIVED: --0.67273 --0.14210 +0.27165 +0.70165 +1.03040
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: planeNormal x: -0.01 y: 0.00 z: 1.00
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: Bed Level Correction Matrix:
    RECEIVED: 0.999958 0.000000 0.009216
    RECEIVED: 0.000020 0.999998 -0.002196
    RECEIVED: -0.009216 0.002196 0.999955
    RECEIVED: ok


    ******* THIRD RUN ********
    RECEIVED: Eqn coefficients: a: 0.01 b: -0.00 d: 0.88
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: Bed Height Topography:
    RECEIVED: --1.62077 --0.91577 --0.21203 +0.44672 +1.01423
    RECEIVED: --1.33452 --0.67515 --0.06953 +0.48735 +0.97860
    RECEIVED: --1.07515 --0.45390 +0.05860 +0.53860 +0.94423
    RECEIVED: --0.85015 --0.27015 +0.18672 +0.60422 +1.00860
    RECEIVED: --0.66453 --0.13703 +0.26860 +0.70047 +1.04172
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: planeNormal x: -0.01 y: 0.00 z: 1.00
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED:
    RECEIVED: Bed Level Correction Matrix:
    RECEIVED: 0.999957 0.000000 0.009226
    RECEIVED: 0.000020 0.999998 -0.002206
    RECEIVED: -0.009226 0.002206 0.999955
    RECEIVED: ok


    I have the bed purposely quite uneven as I was struggling to tell if the Z-Axis was moving at all to begin with.

    I've attached a couple of config files in case they help at all.

    Final thought on probe offsets, I believe these are correct. Probe is directly in front of extruder on X axis (0), is 30mm in front of extruder in Y axis (-30), and the gap between the extruder and bed is 2mm which Z is homed (-2).

    Any thoughts or recommendations gratefully received! Thanks!!

    PS. I've just taken some manual readings from a matching 9 points around the print bed after performing a G28 to home. These are the results which seem to match nicely with what the sensor is saying (+- 0.1).

    Y / X | 30 | 147 | 262
    ------------------------------------
    285 | -1.7 | -0.2 | +0.8

    170 | -1.0 | 0 | +0.9

    55 | -0.5 | +0.3 | +0.9
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Astek777; 08-14-2015 at 10:50 AM.

  10. #10
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    That is a lot of difference between the back left and the front right. I would suggest you use the T and V options to level that out as well as you can. You want to get that difference less than .5 mm and preferably, even less than that.

Page 55 of 65 FirstFirst ... 5455354555657 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •