Understood. I'm getting predictable performance now. It was all about that 'First layer height' that I was misinterpreting. I have my paper gap (just measured that paper and it's 0.11mm) so I''ll now respect that 'First layer height' properly. Thanks for all of your guidance. We all know a lot of stuff but none of us knows everything. That's what makes forums so powerful. The expertise that is shared in collaboration is just priceless. Sometimes we get so wrapped up we can't see the forest for the trees.

Thanks again. I'm really pleased with the consistency in gaps that I'm getting now.