Close



Results 1 to 10 of 243

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Its actually a hardware bug that might be solvable with software. When the audio is "laser off", its at a different location than "laser on". Its a problem with the circuit, but we hope to get the software to get a calibrated offset whenever the laser is off. When the laser turns on at the same point on every layer, there is a small section that never gets cured properly because the laser wasn't there in time.

    Until then I've used a bandaid fix that doesn't get rid of the twitch when the laser comes on, but randomizes the starting point of each layer, so it doesn't happen at the same point on every layer.

    The program I made to randomize the gcode was my first useful python program and first time looking inside gcode files
    It still needs hand editing to set the speed to start at (I probably should have left the first layer alone), and there might be other things.
    gcode_scrambler.zip
    Last edited by erikk; 05-22-2014 at 03:49 PM.

  2. #2
    @erikk - I like it - will try it out on my cylinder at the weekend and let you know how it goes.

    Or, we just keep the laser on, but scan it fast out of area between sublayers.

  3. #3
    Technologist
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    110
    Colehard - I'd be interested in getting a copy of the files, if you could post them here. Probably won't have time to do anything with them, but I might get around to it.

  4. #4
    I tried the new Peachy Tools software that has been rewritten with some enhancements. Not sure if they meant to fix the axing but that doesn't seem as bad. However, now the software goes straight from GCode to printer control. No in between CUE/WAV files. I don't think my computer is quite up to doing this in real-time (without compiled code) so i have a couple of other issues.

    But I was able to get a print out. My resin is getting a bit messed up so that may explain some of the holes. I am only running with a couple of mm of resin on the salt solution. I still have problems with drip and vertical calibration - The 'cube' in this picture is placed next to the cylinder from last weekend. My XY scaling is much better.

    2014-05-26 07.44.38.jpg2014-05-26 07.44.38.jpg

    I really rushed this out to have something this weekend so pretty good all things considered. I need to spend some more time on my Z calibration and really need to spend time on setting up my saline flow - I am wading through salt crystals on my work bench because of spillage. I am so desperate to play with the printing that I took shortcuts on mounting/saline flow that are becoming a pain now. Oh, and BTW, you do not want to get resin on your lips so some up with a good siphon solution (no pun intended) to get the salt water from the build tank back to the holding tank. It burns.

  5. #5
    OK, really pleased with this one. Tardis - unfortunately the pictures don't show the detail - the windows and windows with slats in them on the top two rows came out perfectly. The top fill is really nice. I had two drip problems at 2mm and near the end hence the offset base and top where i knocked my print reservoir. My Z axis is about 150% out of wack. I will try once more with modified drips/mm and enough water in the top tank.

    Also, note that even though the base got offset by a few mm, causing a gaping whole above the space, that side did start printing again. This gives an idea of the overhang capability which looks pretty good.

    It is much more impressive in real life.
    2014-05-26 15.04.06.jpg2014-05-26 15.05.28.jpg2014-05-26 15.05.01.jpg2014-05-26 15.04.48.jpg2014-05-26 15.04.43.jpg
    Last edited by colehard; 05-26-2014 at 02:23 PM.

  6. #6
    So, slower drips are smaller - I think someone else made that finding. Anyway - got a full tardis out with no holes. Just a bit short in the Z. The detail is really good. Looks like I also have to recenter my beam as the print has a bit of a lean. The detail on every side of this is perfect. Wish the picture could be better - someone suggested painting, maybe I will try that sometime.

    2014-05-26 19.31.23.jpg

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by colehard View Post
    So, slower drips are smaller - I think someone else made that finding. Anyway - got a full tardis out with no holes. Just a bit short in the Z. The detail is really good. Looks like I also have to recenter my beam as the print has a bit of a lean. The detail on every side of this is perfect. Wish the picture could be better - someone suggested painting, maybe I will try that sometime.

    2014-05-26 19.31.23.jpg
    how ow is the Z axis off? I thought the drip counter once calibrated to the size of the build tank was supposed to ensure accurate Z height, it shouldn't matter if you have a fast or slow drip, am I missing something?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •