Close



Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818

    Looking for a recommendation for further design software.

    I keep hitting facet limitations on openscad.
    So I'm looking for a free (so don't say rhino, autocad etc) design program with parametric abilities that doesn't fall over at 6000+ facets.
    You try designing a golf ball or pin-board in openscad - just can't be done - at least I don't know how to do it without killing openscad in the process.
    The more I look at the parent child command the less It makes sense.

    So I need an easy to use cad program - that doesn't require any native artistic skills and can produce complex iterations at a pinch.

    It also needs to be downloadable as the wifi in my workshop isn't brilliant and having to use web based packages just isn't going to do the job.
    Does it exist ?
    And if so - what's it called and where do i get it from :-)

  2. #2
    Good free programs are Designspark, 123D and Creo Elements... or so I've heard. I don't use them personally (I do use Creo 2.0 Parametric at work, along with Geomagic and Catia, but apparently it is very different from Creo Elements). I don't that they can only save as native format and stl, you won't be able to export as stp, igs, x_t, etc.

    Good luck and would love to hear feedback on which you chose, why and how it works for you!


  3. #3
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    Quote Originally Posted by Sebastian Finke View Post
    Good free programs are Designspark, 123D and Creo Elements... or so I've heard. I don't use them personally (I do use Creo 2.0 Parametric at work, along with Geomagic and Catia, but apparently it is very different from Creo Elements). I don't that they can only save as native format and stl, you won't be able to export as stp, igs, x_t, etc.

    Good luck and would love to hear feedback on which you chose, why and how it works for you!
    I only want stl files :-)

    DesignSpark PCB is a free-of-charge schematic capture and PCB layout tool for electronics design automation (EDA), for use by professional electronics design engineers, hobbyists, educators and students.[
    well that's out.

    creo elements:
    Download this free 3D CAD software and create assemblies with up to 60 unique parts.
    Hmm, I want something that'll handle hundreds of unique parts.
    Might be useful for other things though - I'll look at it :-)

    the autodesk stuff is all online and facebook linked. That just makes me shudder.

    I know, I know, I'm a fussy bastard.

  4. #4
    See here:

    DesignSpark Mechanical. This is a free MCAD package, exactly what you want.

    Autodesk 123D. This version is downloadable, not online. And is very popular.

    Creo Elements. I use Creo Parametric 2.0 at work along with Catia and Geomagic Design. While Elements is quite different from its big brother I can assure you that PTC make very powerful software.

    All of the above save in native format and export stl's too, again exactly what you want.


  5. #5
    I should add that if you ever feel like buying a CAD package then I highly recommend Cubify Invent ($50) and Cubify Design ($200).


  6. #6
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    I've got no problem acquiring commercial software. I just find that opensource is generally better written and easier to use.

    And i do mean a lot. The golfball needs at least 3-400 and the pinboard was probably 1200 or so for the one it wouldn't let me render.
    Last edited by curious aardvark; 07-06-2015 at 03:50 PM.

  7. #7
    Super Moderator Roxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Lone Star State
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    I've got no problem acquiring commercial software. I just find that opensource is generally better written and easier to use.
    And... If you want a change, you don't have to beg the company to do it. You can dig in and make it happen.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    I've got no problem acquiring commercial software. I just find that opensource is generally better written and easier to use.
    The opensource software I have tried has led me to believe differently but each to his own...


  9. #9
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    Or to put it another way: I don't need a 10 ton steam hammer to crack a hazelnut.

    Just want something simple to use that will get me round the limitations of openscad when it comes to a lot of iterated shapes.

  10. #10
    Engineer-in-Training
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI / Ft Walton Beach, FL
    Posts
    398
    Add Wolfie on Thingiverse
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    Or to put it another way: I don't need a 10 ton steam hammer to crack a hazelnut.
    Maybe not but I suspect the 10 ton steam hammer would be a lot more fun than a pair of pliers.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •