Close



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    MUPPette Flying UAV 3D Printer Unveiled

    The beginning stages of the MUPPette flying 3D printer have been unveiled. This printer is being created by three designers working for a company called Gensler in Los Angeles, California. The MUPPette 3D printer uses an unmanned aerial vehicle, a gimble for stabilization, and a 3D printer extruder to print PLA plastics from the air. The purpose of the project, which has been going on for 13 months already, is to create a 3D printer which has no build size constraints. There is still a lot of work to be done, with Gensler planning to work on this thing for several years to come.
    Further details on this amazing machine can be found here: http://3dprint.com/4111/muppette-3d-printer-flying/

    Check out the picture of the video of the MUPPette below:

  2. #2
    Technician 3D OZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    54
    "There is still a lot of work to be done" said Captain Understatement.

    In 13 months they managed to get a copter off the ground carrying an extruder which then extruded totally indiscriminately. Pointless.

    Just as useful as taping an extruder to your Cat!

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by 3D OZ View Post
    Just as useful as taping an extruder to your Cat!
    Dogs would probably be a better build platform. i cant get my cat to do anything.

  4. #4
    Technician f.larsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    68
    Quote Originally Posted by 3D OZ View Post
    "There is still a lot of work to be done" said Captain Understatement.

    In 13 months they managed to get a copter off the ground carrying an extruder which then extruded totally indiscriminately. Pointless.

    Just as useful as taping an extruder to your Cat!

    I'm at work right now, and I just BLURTED out a stream of laughter, that was well said. Still giggling - extruder on your cat.

  5. #5
    Engineer
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    494
    Although they may still have a ways to go I do feel that they are onto something. Why do I feel this way? Because Drone and 3d printing technologies are expanding extremely quickly. Look how far we have come in only 2-3 years.

  6. #6
    Technician
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry View Post
    Although they may still have a ways to go I do feel that they are onto something. Why do I feel this way? Because Drone and 3d printing technologies are expanding extremely quickly. Look how far we have come in only 2-3 years.
    That's like saying puppies are good and coffee is good, let's combine them! ha ha. I think we can all safely say that 3D printing via drone will never become a viable reality in our lifetime.

  7. #7
    Staff Engineer
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by brbubba View Post
    I think we can all safely say that 3D printing via drone will never become a viable reality in our lifetime.
    I say we let it be this generation's Flying Car. People who understand enough about either field know that the core concept of a quadcopter printer is hopelessly flawed, but it sounds so good to the layperson that it might inspire them to learn more.

  8. #8
    The key problem here is that 3D printers have tolerances of millimeters, which can fail a build. You have to stabilize the extruder in real space, within millimeters, and that's something that these multi-rotors just can't do.

  9. #9
    Technician f.larsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    68
    I think the key problem is time, then weight, then tolerance.

    Drones do not last longer then 30 minutes. Okay, so you put a bigger battery on it, well that adds weight, which means you have to have bigger motors which also adds more weight. It's a curve that doesn't give you the return you would want. Then, you strap on a different battery to run the extruder, heating and stepper motor, have you felt how heavy those are, even for an octocopter this weight will be important.

    This is when I agree with dmanexe, tolerance of a millimeter. All of us try really hard to minimize the wobble and vibration on your 3d printers and those are sitting on solid ground. Now you have a device that is subjected to winds and extreme vibration. Did you even watch the video, it was all over the place. Yes I know it's in it's infancy and accuracy will come with time, but then I refer to my original point - time.

    At this time it is a neat concept. It's hard enough to get people to buy into a desktop 3d printer. It's hard for people to purchase a quadrocopter, nevermind a octocopter. Putting both together is extremely niche.

    I'm glad it's considered a research project.

  10. #10
    Engineer-in-Training
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    223
    Have to agree with f.larsen, this thing is useless.
    If you need to print something so large that you have to use a multicopter then it will take a lot longer to print than the flight autonomy of the machine. You'll need a swarm of drones to get anything done in a reasonable amount of time and then in between the complexity and cost of that you'd be better off building a honking big printer in the first place, or perhaps something like a robot arm on wheels with an extruder that could move around a large print.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •