Results 1 to 10 of 15
Hybrid View
-
05-20-2014, 07:51 PM #1
MUPPette Flying UAV 3D Printer Unveiled
The beginning stages of the MUPPette flying 3D printer have been unveiled. This printer is being created by three designers working for a company called Gensler in Los Angeles, California. The MUPPette 3D printer uses an unmanned aerial vehicle, a gimble for stabilization, and a 3D printer extruder to print PLA plastics from the air. The purpose of the project, which has been going on for 13 months already, is to create a 3D printer which has no build size constraints. There is still a lot of work to be done, with Gensler planning to work on this thing for several years to come.
Further details on this amazing machine can be found here: http://3dprint.com/4111/muppette-3d-printer-flying/
Check out the picture of the video of the MUPPette below:
-
05-20-2014, 11:11 PM #2
"There is still a lot of work to be done" said Captain Understatement.
In 13 months they managed to get a copter off the ground carrying an extruder which then extruded totally indiscriminately. Pointless.
Just as useful as taping an extruder to your Cat!
-
05-21-2014, 09:33 AM #3
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 19
-
05-21-2014, 09:50 AM #4
-
05-21-2014, 10:35 AM #5
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- New Jersey, USA
- Posts
- 494
Although they may still have a ways to go I do feel that they are onto something. Why do I feel this way? Because Drone and 3d printing technologies are expanding extremely quickly. Look how far we have come in only 2-3 years.
-
12-15-2014, 08:14 AM #6
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Posts
- 94
-
12-15-2014, 08:23 AM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Georgia
- Posts
- 934
-
05-21-2014, 10:44 AM #8
- Join Date
- May 2014
- Posts
- 2
The key problem here is that 3D printers have tolerances of millimeters, which can fail a build. You have to stabilize the extruder in real space, within millimeters, and that's something that these multi-rotors just can't do.
-
05-21-2014, 11:00 AM #9
I think the key problem is time, then weight, then tolerance.
Drones do not last longer then 30 minutes. Okay, so you put a bigger battery on it, well that adds weight, which means you have to have bigger motors which also adds more weight. It's a curve that doesn't give you the return you would want. Then, you strap on a different battery to run the extruder, heating and stepper motor, have you felt how heavy those are, even for an octocopter this weight will be important.
This is when I agree with dmanexe, tolerance of a millimeter. All of us try really hard to minimize the wobble and vibration on your 3d printers and those are sitting on solid ground. Now you have a device that is subjected to winds and extreme vibration. Did you even watch the video, it was all over the place. Yes I know it's in it's infancy and accuracy will come with time, but then I refer to my original point - time.
At this time it is a neat concept. It's hard enough to get people to buy into a desktop 3d printer. It's hard for people to purchase a quadrocopter, nevermind a octocopter. Putting both together is extremely niche.
I'm glad it's considered a research project.
-
05-21-2014, 12:51 PM #10
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Posts
- 223
Have to agree with f.larsen, this thing is useless.
If you need to print something so large that you have to use a multicopter then it will take a lot longer to print than the flight autonomy of the machine. You'll need a swarm of drones to get anything done in a reasonable amount of time and then in between the complexity and cost of that you'd be better off building a honking big printer in the first place, or perhaps something like a robot arm on wheels with an extruder that could move around a large print.
Ender 3 Neo - Jam Problem
Yesterday, 03:06 PM in Tips, Tricks and Tech Help