Close



Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Some perimeters are fatter than others (Problem in Slic3r but not Cura)

    I am trying to iron out some bugs with Slic3r that are either insignificant or not present in Cura. Basically certain perimeters may get fatter or smaller and will appear as bands around certain parts of the print.
    I have some pictures describing the problem:

    20160113_223550.jpg20160113_223834.jpg20160113_223917.jpg20160113_224009.jpg

    The boat with all the pencil marks is in Slic3r, the other is in Cura. I cannot make out any warping or drooping during the printing.I have done 6 of these with Slic3r and 3 with Cura and have solved many problems along the way, but I cannot pinpoint what is causing issues here.

    I have experimented with printing the Inner vs Outer perimeter first, and with placement of the seams. Doing inner perimeters first + random seam placement helped in certain areas like the bow, but had little effect elsewhere. On top of that, many of these bands end up in the same locations on the print with different settings.

    Any idea what might be causing this?

    Edit: In earlier prints before I took care of the seams, the seams where the perimeters started got too much extrusion as shown in the following picture:

    20160114_000855.jpg

    My setup is:
    - FF Creator Pro w/ Sailfish 7.7
    - Sainsmart White 1.75 mm PLA
    - Klapton Tapeed Bed
    - Slic3r 1.2.9 and Cura 15.04.3

    Settings are nearly identical for both slicers:

    - Extruder: 200C first layer, 190C all others
    - Bed: 60C first layer, off all others
    - Cooling Fan: off first layer, fully on at 3rd layer

    - 20 mm/s 1st layer
    - 40 mm/s infill and inner perimeters
    - 60 mm/s bridges
    - 20 mm/s all others

    - 0.3 mm height first layer
    - 0.2 mm height other layers
    - 0.8 mm width first layer
    - 0.4 mm width other layers

    - 15% Rectilinear Infill
    - 2 perimeters
    - Printing order: Inner Perimeters > Outer Perimeters > Infill
    - 3 Top/Bottom solid layers
    Last edited by FailFTW; 01-13-2016 at 11:08 PM.

  2. #2
    Since you're running a FFCP I would suggest trying Makerware too, just as an extra comparison. Personally I never got smooth prints from Slic3r. Pity 'cos I would like to use it...


  3. #3
    Senior Engineer
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Burnley, UK
    Posts
    1,662
    I also gave slic3r several weeks of my life and would have liked to use it but I abandoned it and went with Cura instead.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    first off - how are you using cura with a ff ? what do you use to get the gpx files for the printer ?

    Secondly - as mj says, cura seems to be doing a much better job and it's a far nicer interface. So why bother with slic3r at all ?

  5. #5
    Is Cura better? I read mixed reviews.


  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    first off - how are you using cura with a ff ? what do you use to get the gpx files for the printer ?

    Secondly - as mj says, cura seems to be doing a much better job and it's a far nicer interface. So why bother with slic3r at all ?
    I just export the gcode files from both slicers and use GPX to convert to x3g and then put it on an SD. I have to do some manual recoding for each program which doesn't take long at all. I will see how Makerware does, although it usually doesn't give as good results as the other two, and I tried RepG and don't like it.

    Right now, I am still experimenting with slicers and settings. I do not want to jump to conclusions before I am sure that I am getting the best I can out of both slicers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •