Close



Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    BigRep PRO - 53 Cu Foot Build Volume

    I have a thing for large 3D printers, I admit. BigRep who earlier this year unveiled an enormous FDM printer called the BigRep one, has just announced an even more robust machine, that's an incredible 8 cubic feet larger then it's last 3D Printer. The BigRep PRO features a build volume of 53 cubic feet, allowing for the printing of furniture pieces. The machine is estimated to retail at around $79,000. More details on the this new massive 3D printer can be found here: http://3dprint.com/13906/bigrep-pro/

    Below is the very first available image of the new BigRep Po 3D Printer. What do you guys think?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    53 cubic feet sounds big - but 1.5 cubic metres doesn't

    What are the ACTUAL print dimensions ?

    Volume measurements are just confusing.

    And what does it print with ?

    Sounds pretty cheap for the size too.

  3. #3
    Engineer-in-Training
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    228
    Is that a photo or a rendering? Is it really that hard to have a product web page ready when a press release is posted? I doubt the specs are in flux.

  4. #4
    Staff Engineer LambdaFF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    France, Aix en Provence
    Posts
    1,139
    Well... must be a Hell of a long print to use this kind of volume. I'll be impressed when they release an announcment of several heads working on it in harmony.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    Ah but for volume that size you'd most likely use a much bigger nozzle and much thicker layers than a small desktop model.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    53 cubic feet sounds big - but 1.5 cubic metres doesn't
    1 feet = 30.8 cm so 53 cubic feet is approximatively 1.5 cubic meter

    So 53 cubic feet give 1.17m x 1.17m x 1.17m cube, which is respectable.

    What did you expect?

  7. #7
    Staff Engineer
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    934
    Quote Originally Posted by curious aardvark View Post
    53 cubic feet sounds big - but 1.5 cubic metres doesn't
    The way I always use to keep the volume scales right in my head is that a cubic meter of water (de-ionized, at sea level yadda yadda) is by definition one ton.

    I don't know about you, but for some reason it's easy for my mind to visualize "if this were a pool, how many tons of water would fill it?"

  8. #8
    Super Moderator curious aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    8,818
    Well having seen a printer with 1x1x0.5 metres

    1.17x1.17x1.17 is pretty big :-)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •