more as the double price-Ultimaker & Makerbot & Cube Pro vs next Da Vinci 2.1 - why ?

[fwgdocs]

what are the reasons ?

• quality of the finish 3D product ?
• speed from print begin to the finish 3D product ?
• or general quality and supply of spare parts of the Da Vinci 3d printer

background - current selection of my 3D Printer invest

Specifications of the da Vinci 2.1 AiO are as follows:

• Technique: FFF (Fused Filament Fabrication)
• Printer Size: 46.8 x 51 x 55.8 cm
• Display: 5” FSTN LCM
• Build Size: 15(X Axis) x 20 x 19(Z Axis)cm
• Layer Thickness: 0.4/0.3/0.2/0.1mm
• Dual Scan Engine: 2M Pixel
• Scan Volume: 15x15x15cm scanning volume

http://3dprint.com/5048/da-vinci-1-0-aio-2-1-aio/

[JohnA136]

A lot of companies hype their products long before anyone sees them in person. Sometimes they work as advertised and sometimes they never make it to market. We will see in six months if these live up to their promise? in the meantime, we can touch and feel the Ultimaker, Makerbots and Cube Pro and see how they print.

Overall, I read that the real life results of the Gen 5 Makerbots are disappointing and many users are returning them and getting their money back. Their new extruder design is a nightmare! The Ultimaker 2 is generally printing well, after a small hiccup and some upgraded extruder parts and the Cube Pro is in the hands of select Beta testers and doing very well.

[OctavioP]

Honestly, I have seen a DaVinci print and I wasn't very impressed. The resolution doesn't seem to be good at all. You see a ton of lines in the prints.

[fwgdocs]

Cube Pro is in the hands of select Beta testers and doing very well.

What are the Cube Pro benefits and disadvantages - from the owner view ?
highest product price (vs Ultimaker 2 & Makerbot)
Depending on the 3D Systems material