So many interesting, unintended consequences.
Governments may let people enforce all kinds of things, The question is dose it make sense....
All I know for sure is i love that you brought this up :)
Printable View
Ah, yes. Good point. Still, I'll bet that YouTube's automated "sounds like copyrighted music" system will find something similar and happily remove the videos.
I am more interested in the reverse relationship. Can you make a song that results in the peachy printer printing an object? Can you secretly embed an object in a song such that you wouldn't know it was there when you listened to the song?
I know nothing about this, but the guy who makes music as Aphex Twin embedded an image of his face in a song that could be seen in an spectrgraph. Well written article here http://www.bastwood.com/?page_id=10
That's a pretty cool idea. Presumably if the Peachy's amplifier has a pretty tight band-pass filter on it then you might be able to do something like that.
Obviously scale would be completely messed up. The X-Y scale depends on how high the Peachy is above the resin (which depends on the installation) and the Z scale depends on the drip rate. However, many objects (eg. a 3D model of a face) would be recognisable even with very substantial scale errors.
I suspect the bigger indicator that there was extra data embedded would be the length of the track - for a nice Peachy print you'd probably have tracks at least half an hour long. That'd be suspicious when most tracks are more like 3 - 5 minutes.