First attempts in openSCAD

I'm completely new to 3D Printing and am not a programmer. I've assembled a generous gift of an Ender 3 V2 and yesterday successfully printed a small model from thingiverse, unchanged (3hrs 22m). But now I want to learn how to design my own or, more likely, to customise others' models.
Attachment 16171
In thingiverse I found a possibly suitable model called 'Ultimate_Box_Generator ' and Download Files delivered these two files:
Box_Template.scad
Ultimate_Box_Generator.scad

I wasn't sure but chose the second file (62 KB).
Q1: When would I need the template file (12 KB)?




I'd seen openSCAD recommended here and elsewhere so I installed that and opened the file. It looked dauntingly complicated (see screenshot) but the thing that puzzles me most is
Q2: Why are there so many 'errors' in its Error Log and Console?
Q3: What should I have done about them? (What I actually did was ignore them!)

I made my changes: x = 100, y = 50, z = 35. I think I may have also changed the 'wall' to 2.5. (My first attempt at this was directly from thingiverse Customizer. It froze and behaved in other quirky ways, which triggered my search for an off-line version.)

Apparently I could do this trivial editing directly in the code, near the top, or using the marginally friendlier Customizer section. I saved the revised scad file with a new name.

After also reading that Ultimaker Cura was popular I then opened the scad file in that and saved it as a gcode file.
Q4: Must 3D printers be presented with a gcode file, no other types, and in the root of the SD card?
Q5: Is there anything else I should have done in Cura apart from clicking the Slicer button?

The Ender 3 V2 is now printing - despite those numerous 'errors'!

Terry, UK

Congratulations on trying your modeling by using OpenSCAD. I've found that sometimes it can be far more challenging to solve problems in someone else's code.

Unfortunately, your screen shot resolution is too low to see the error messages.

well that is insanely long for a simple box generator. I suppose it does have a lid as well.
But honestly you are better off starting by making your own. #
A simple box is a great way to start:

Quote:

---

difference(){
cube ([50,20,10],center=true);
translate([0,0,2]) cube ([46,16,10],center=true);
} // end difference

---

viola - a box with 2mm thick walls and base and 50mm long by 20 wide and 10mm tall - good for screws and bits.

To make this parametric you just need to indulge in a little algebra and throw in some variables

Quote:

---

bl=50; // box length
bw=20; // box width
bh=10; //box height
wt=2; // wall thickness
bt=1; // base thickness

difference(){
cube ([bl,bw,bh],center=true);
translate([0,0,bt])cube ([bl-2*wt,bw-2*wt,bh],center=true);
} // end difference

---

And that's a 2 line cubic box generator.

To make a different shape box you use cylinders instead of cubes and change the number of facets to the shape you want.
so a 4 facet cylinder is a cube and a 3 facet cylinder is a triangle. You use a resize command to change the shape from a fixed diameter 'cylinder' to the length and breadth you specify. :

Quote:

---

bl=50; // box length
bw=20; // box width
bh=10; //box height
wt=2; // wall thickness
bt=1; // base thickness
bs=3; // box shape

difference(){
resize([bl,bw,bh]) cylinder(d=10,h=10,$fn=bs);
translate([0,0,bt]) resize([bl-2*wt,bw-2*wt,bh]) cylinder(d=10,h=10,$fn=bs);
} // end difference

---

2 line infinite shape box generator.

So you start with a simple centred cube and difference a smaller cube - if you center it you don't have to muck about with moving it about to get it centred yourself.
wall thickness happens on both sides of the shape - so you always have to multiply it by 2.

In the second example you use algebra to make the sizes variable.
And in the third example you use different number sided 'cylinders' to change the number of sides of the shape.
A resize command over rules all subsequent sizes - so it doesn't matter what size you make the original cylinder.

I don't do programming - so i approach openscad very differently to programmers.
I like to make it easy to read what I've done - so I use short variables and never indent anything. Most programmers use whole sentences for variables and end up with something almost unguessable - in my opinion ;-)

The beauty of openscad is that you can write the scripts any way you like.
The way I approach a design problem is also simple.
work out what you want to make and then break it down into simple shapes. Then work out what shapes need to be added or removed and where they need to be and go from there.

It does seem daunting at first.
But once you've got your own script style that you can read and have worked out what the commands do - it's really a lot better and more precise than moving stuff around with a mouse.

And so much faster !

Also - and one of it's best points - everything generated by a script is a solid shape that will print.
No errors.

As far as all the different brackets and why they are where there are, goes, don't sweat it.
Just get into the habit of putting them where the cheatsheet says they should go and don't worry about what they do :-)

Attachment 16077

Actually, it turns out that a 4 sided cylinder make a diamond shape.
This is one of the things I like about openscad - things don't always turn out how you think they will and you probably learn more by this kind of rndom accident than by anything else :-)
Attachment 16078

Thanks, and I agree that screenshot resolution is very poor, sorry.

Here is the scad file:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/stuqnbril2...tor.scad?raw=1

And here is a list of the errors:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2dirnlt7z...rors.txt?raw=1

[QUOTE=curious aardvark;150378]well that is insanely long for a simple box generator. I suppose it does have a lid as well.
[quote]
Yes. Here's a photo:
Well, I inserted one but it didn't show up! I'll try a link:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/44mfvefp2p...id-2.jpg?raw=1

I'll look into the speed issue, but others don't appear to think that's an unrealistic time. I used the default settings for everything on my Ender 3 V2

Quote:

---

But honestly you are better off starting by making your own. #
A simple box is a great way to start:

difference(){
cube ([50,20,10],center=true);
translate([0,0,2]) cube ([46,16,10],center=true);
} // end difference

viola - a box with 2mm thick walls and base and 50mm long by 20 wide and 10mm tall - good for screws and bits.

---

I know that to you it must appear trivially simple. But, as a complete beginner, the only line of your code that I understand is the cube definition, syntax apart! But I think I can learn a great deal from this thread if you'll all bear with me!

Quote:

---

To make this parametric you just need to indulge in a little algebra and throw in some variables

---

Is the 'parametric' (which I interpret as 'something specified by using parameters') defined as a sort of function? In this example is it Difference? And do all its commands (right label?) have to be in curly brackets? So with these four lines (you say two later?) we are making part of a box by subtracting one cube from another?

That's not immediately intuitive, right? I'd assumed I'd build it as I would with simple woodwork, by making six rectangles and gluing or pinning five together, and then thinking how to handle the sixth (the lid). But presumably that wouldn't work for 3D printing, as the main five pieces would not be joined?

Quote:

---

And that's a 2 line cubic box generator.

To make a different shape box you use cylinders instead of cubes and change the number of facets to the shape you want.
so a 4 facet cylinder is a cube and a 3 facet cylinder is a triangle. You use a resize command to change the shape from a fixed diameter 'cylinder' to the length and breadth you specify. :

---

I'll be happy to stay exclusively with cubes for now, thanks. Although I will soon want to add a few holes. This new 3D printing hobby will complement the stuff I do with electronics projects. So cases in particular are my initial interest.

Attachment 16079

Quote:

---

2 line infinite shape box generator.

So you start with a simple centred cube and difference a smaller cube - if you center it you don't have to muck about with moving it about to get it centred yourself.
wall thickness happens on both sides of the shape - so you always have to multiply it by 2.

---

Ah, OK, I think that's not only answered my question earlier but also my puzzlement that when I changed the 'center=true' to 'center=false' I got this:

Attachment 16080

Quote:

---

In the second example you use algebra to make the sizes variable.
And in the third example you use different number sided 'cylinders' to change the number of sides of the shape.
A resize command over rules all subsequent sizes - so it doesn't matter what size you make the original cylinder.

I don't do programming - so i approach openscad very differently to programmers.
I like to make it easy to read what I've done - so I use short variables and never indent anything. Most programmers use whole sentences for variables and end up with something almost unguessable - in my opinion ;-)

The beauty of openscad is that you can write the scripts any way you like.
The way I approach a design problem is also simple.
work out what you want to make and then break it down into simple shapes. Then work out what shapes need to be added or removed and where they need to be and go from there.

It does seem daunting at first.
But once you've got your own script style that you can read and have worked out what the commands do - it's really a lot better and more precise than moving stuff around with a mouse.

And so much faster !

Also - and one of it's best points - everything generated by a script is a solid shape that will print.
No errors.

As far as all the different brackets and why they are where there are, goes, don't sweat it.
Just get into the habit of putting them where the cheatsheet says they should go and don't worry about what they do :-)

Attachment 16077

---

That's an extremely helpful post, thanks so much. I'm going to study and play with your cube but I'm afraid I will be back quite soon asking stuff like:
- How do I get a bottom on the box?
- And a hole of R mm diameter in one of the surfaces?

The reason I started with thingiverse was because although I might be able to manage a very basic box myself, I was sure that other essential elements would be beyond me. Such as lids (either sliding or screw-on), and holes, and grooves on the sides for circuit boards, etc.

I have been considering trying FreeCAD but must say I do like openSCAD and think that's the one I'll be using.

Terry, UK

A good alternative to opencad is Fusion360 which has a free version for non commercial use.

stick with openscad.

Once you get used to how things work - it's amazing how easy it is.

I use diameters NOT radius - the reason being.
1)I do not know anything about complicaed geometry and sins and cosin and the like.
2) If I set the diameter of a cylinder - the cylinder will be that size. If I set the radius of a xylinder I will need to double that number to get the size I actually wanted. So I never use radius always diameter :-)

You don't actually need to be good at maths to use openscad (obviously) but you do need to know what you want to do.

Also it is a good idea to put comments in your scripts. This really helps when coming back to a complicated script.

{ - curly brackets are used to enclose a series of commands, usually.

so difference() {
shape 1
shape 2
} // end diff
shape 2 is removed from shape one. It's actually a lot better than that as you can have as many shapes as you like removed from shape 1.
the () brackets are there for a reason I do not know. you just always add them - and that's all I need to know lol
No doubt if I had an idea what they were for they might be useful. But I don't.
One thing I will say is that the manual is almost incomprehensible. After about 8 years, 90% of the openscad still makes no sense to me.
It's written by programmers for programmers - no actual humans were involved.
I pretty much stick to the cheatsheet and the odd wuestion askd in th openscad forum on thingiverse.
Although if you get a programmer answering - it's invariably incomprehensible and massively over complicated.

So from a wood working point of view:

Quote:

---

$fn=60; // set 50 facets to give us nice round holes that rendet fairly fast

difference(){
translate([0,0,25])cube([100,100,50],center=true); // start with a block of wood - because it is centred in all 3 axis, we'll lift it 25mm with translate so that's at 0 on the z axis.
cylinder(d=20,h=55); // cylinders are always centred on 0,0,0 before youmove them. so we drill a 30mm hole through the centre of the block
// we'll cut another couple of holes
translate([35,30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);
translate([35,-30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);

translate([0,0,27]) cube([92,92,50],center=true); // we remove a chunk from center of the the box to leave a 2mm floor and 4mm walls all around.
translate([2,0,46.5]) cube([96,96,2.5],center=true); // creates a 2.5mm groove in three sides.
translate([48,0,51]) cube([10,92,10],center=true); // we then remove the excess wood to make it easier to print
} // end diff

---

Now when doing difference operations it can be bloody difficult working out where the invisible shape you want to remove from your initial shape, actually is.
So what we do is to put a % in front of the shape we want to see.

In this case I wanted to see where the last piece I removed was, because it's easier to just move stuff around till it's where you want it than to actually work it out mathematically - well it is for me:
Attachment 16084

You need to remove the % before you do an f6 render as otherwise it won't be actioned.
It's purely so you can see where things are.

Okay so we now have a hollow box with a groove cut for a sliding lid and some mysterious holes cut in the bottom.
Do you know what it is yet ?
I'll give you a clue. it's spring on the way and this could go in your garden ;-)

So the only thing we need now is a lid.

BUT !
how can we add a lid and then generate two seperate models to print ?
Hmmmm.....
! I know. we can use the: 'module' - one of the most useful commands you have.

You can divide different parts of your script into chinks called 'modules'. The clever thing about a module is that you can use it as a single shape. in another script. Or call it on it's own.

So first we need to turn our box into a module:
I'll continue below :-)

Quote:

---

$fn=60; // set 50 facets to give us nice round holes that rendet fairly fast
module box(){

difference(){
translate([0,0,25])cube([100,100,50],center=true); // start with a block of wood - because it is centred in all 3 axis, we'll lift it 25mm with translate so that's at 0 on the z axis.
cylinder(d=20,h=55); // cylinders are always centred on 0,0,0 before youmove them. so we drill a 30mm hole through the centre of the block
// we'll cut another couple of holes
translate([35,30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);
translate([35,-30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);

translate([0,0,27]) cube([92,92,50],center=true); // we remove a chunk from center of the the box to leave a 2mm floor and 4mm walls all around.
translate([2,0,46.5]) cube([96,96,2.5],center=true); // creates a 2.5mm groove in three sides.
translate([48,0,51]) cube([10,92,10],center=true); // we then remove the excess wood to make it easier to print
} // end diff
} // end module

---

Now when you press f5 or f6, absolutely nothing happens - OH NO !
Ah but wait, we have isolated the script - but we haven't told openscad what to do with it.
so the generate the module box()

we need to tell openscad that's what we want to do:

Quote:

---

$fn=60; // set 50 facets to give us nice round holes that rendet fairly fast
module box(){

difference(){
translate([0,0,25])cube([100,100,50],center=true); // start with a block of wood - because it is centred in all 3 axis, we'll lift it 25mm with translate so that's at 0 on the z axis.
cylinder(d=20,h=55); // cylinders are always centred on 0,0,0 before youmove them. so we drill a 30mm hole through the centre of the block
// we'll cut another couple of holes
translate([35,30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);
translate([35,-30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);

translate([0,0,27]) cube([92,92,50],center=true); // we remove a chunk from center of the the box to leave a 2mm floor and 4mm walls all around.
translate([2,0,46.5]) cube([96,96,2.5],center=true); // creates a 2.5mm groove in three sides.
translate([48,0,51]) cube([10,92,10],center=true); // we then remove the excess wood to make it easier to print
} // end diff
} // end module

box();

---

Now the f5 and f6 work again.

Now we need to make our sliding box lid. Essentiall just a basic cube.
We know how large the cube was that crated the groove - so we make the lid a little smaller in width and thickness so it slides in and out easily.
we create module lid() and comment out module box() - so that when we press f5 or f6 - we only generate the part we want to export as an stl file.

Quote:

---

$fn=60; // set 50 facets to give us nice round holes that rendet fairly fast
module box(){

difference(){
translate([0,0,25])cube([100,100,50],center=true); // start with a block of wood - because it is centred in all 3 axis, we'll lift it 25mm with translate so that's at 0 on the z axis.
cylinder(d=20,h=55); // cylinders are always centred on 0,0,0 before youmove them. so we drill a 30mm hole through the centre of the block
// we'll cut another couple of holes
translate([35,30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);
translate([35,-30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);

translate([0,0,27]) cube([92,92,50],center=true); // we remove a chunk from center of the the box to leave a 2mm floor and 4mm walls all around.
translate([2,0,46.5]) cube([96,96,2.5],center=true); // creates a 2.5mm groove in three sides.
translate([48,0,51]) cube([10,92,10],center=true); // we then remove the excess wood to make it easier to print
} // end diff
} // end module

module lid(){
cube([95.5,96,2]);

} // end mod

//box();
lid();

---

And there you have a small bird box. With screw holes and a sliding lid.

Although on reflection it would be a total bastard to print. I was concentrating more on the openscad tutorial side than the actual box I'm afraid.

But yeah, thinking like a wood worker is how i tend to do it.
You are either removing bits of a shape or sticking other bits to it.

I'll have some lunch and make a better bird box lol

Finally the basic script - without all the waffle:

Quote:

---

$fn=60;
module box(){

difference(){
translate([0,0,25])cube([100,100,50],center=true); axis.
cylinder(d=20,h=55);
// we'll cut another couple of holes
translate([35,30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);
translate([35,-30,-5]) cylinder(d=3,h=10);

translate([0,0,27]) cube([92,92,50],center=true);
translate([2,0,46.5]) cube([96,96,2.5],center=true); // creates a 2.5mm groove in three sides.
translate([48,0,51]) cube([10,92,10],center=true);
} // end diff
} // end module

module lid(){
cube([95.5,96,2]);

} // end mod

//box();
lid();

---

Thanks Gambo. I have actually been trying to do that, to make an informed comparison. But after many attempts over three days I have still not received a verification email.

I successfully registered. I downloaded the program as the file Fusion 360 Client Downloader.exe When I try to run that by signing in I get told I haven't verified my account and that a verification email will be sent (and a message pops up saying 'Sent'). But it never arrives. Not in trash. Tried Resend a dozen times yesterday and this morning. Nor did following other options via Contact get anywhere. All loop back to the same stuff, Catch 22, no verification. Life's too short, so I've abandoned Fusion.

I have also installed FreeCAD. But the more I get into practical learning with openSCAD, such as in this thread, the more I think that will be my choice for now.

(And on first opening FreeCAD with the same Ultimate Box under discussion, everything was a dull grey and I couldn't immediately move it around, which gave me a negative first impression - albeit shamefully irrational!)

Excellent, thanks a bunch, really appreciate your putting so much time and effort into that.

It's going to take me a while to step through it methodically, but it's already clear that your help will greatly accelerate my crawl up the learning curve!

@terrypin, I've used both OpenSCAD and Fusion360 and like both of them for what little I can do in either program. I've learned that some people take well to OpenSCAD and others run away. FreeCAD is now on my machine, but I'll probably put off the hours of YouTube tutorials, especially if I can get the job done with F360 or OpenSCAD.

If you can build your code from square one using parameters and relationships, you'll have a good start. I like to test my code by changing a value, to see if the other settings follow. Sometimes the hole you thought would adjust to the new figure ends up in outer space and you debug to find the failed relationship. That's part of the fun (sometimes).

Tinkercad used to be useful.
But as you can't seem to either import or export anymore, seems to have gone downhill since the last update.

Yet another argument against cloud software.
At least with normal programs you can get hold of the older versions that actually work ????

Thanks Fred. Sounds like we share a similar practical attitude to this stuff.

I'd forgotten about Tinkercad, although a friend uses it exclusively. I just signed in and found that download and export (.obj, .stl) work, as does import. Something amiss?

Hi I am sorry to here you have had trouble getting Fusion360. as Fred-u-dot says it has a completely different approach to OpensCad. I have used both but having come up through AutoDesk prodects since AcadV13 in 1982 I am more comfortable in their approach.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by terrypin

Thanks, and I agree that screenshot resolution is very poor, sorry.

Here is the scad file:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/stuqnbril2...tor.scad?raw=1

And here is a list of the errors:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u2dirnlt7z...rors.txt?raw=1

---

Note that what you're getting are WARNINGs, not ERRORs. The script does appear to execute with those warnings.

As CA noted, that's a pretty complex script. I'd set it aside until you grasp openSCAD basics. There are several tutorials out there that walk through examples. I have also found an incredible resource to have open when working with openSCAD is the openSCAD cheat sheet.

Having done a few of my own small box scripts, they do start out simple. But by the time you add mounting tabs, a lid with lip, rounded corners, etc. things can get complex pretty quick. That said, I'm always amazed at what one can do in openSCAD and it's basic foundation of adding and subtracting the basic cube, cylinder and sphere shapes.

On openSCAD vs other tools, a few comments. First, at least with openSCAD you'll at least sometimes find originators posting their source file to sites like Thingiverse. I'd say far more so than with any other tool. When I'm looking for a model on Thingiverse, I pretty much only pay attention to those that include the source so that I can tweak or correct things to my liking - reposting the update back on Thingiverse if the licensing requires it. Second, an argument is made that people fall into two categories. Some are more artistic and will want to work with a graphical 3D modeling tool. Others are more analytical and will prefer the scripting approach of a tool like openSCAD. THERE IS NO SINGLE "BEST" TOOL THAT APPLIES TO EVERYONE. You just need to try a few different things and figure out which approach you're brain prefers.

Thanks printbus. I'm stepping through examples here and in several tutorials, so making progress.

But patience isn't one of my strong points, so it's good to have others' models and code to build on. When working on that first box I changed only its dimensions so felt on reasonbly safe ground.

here's some homework then.

take the 'birdbox'.
remove the end where the lid slides in.
Then create a seperate piece that glues there (two cubes one on top of the other would do it).

That way you can orient the box on the bed with the grooves vertical for easy printing and print the lid and side flat and seperately.

That's what I was going to do - but I got sidetracked, I frequently get sidetracked for days, sometimes years...

Thanks, a fascinating possible exercise. But I'm in the same boat: in fact I'm currently in a sub-sidetrack of a sidetrack!

Now we're talking Fractals!

fractally sidetracked - I need to get that on a t-shirt !

'I know you asked me something, but I've been fractally side tracked !'

The thing about openscad is that at first it looks complicated.

But as long as you break it down into basic shapes. Moving them about and adding and taking them away from each other.
It's actually really easy.

Also do not worry about WHY the brackets are where they are. Just type them and carry on.

Even after 8 years if using this I still look at the cheat sheet every single time I do a 'for' loop: for (i = [start:end])
I just can't seem to remember that exact sequence.

And I still haven't got my head around calling other scripts within another script.

I've used font libraries and thread libraries. But only by copying :-)

I'm just glad there are people out there who do understand the manual and can translate it from 'programmer' back into 'human' for people like me.

I'm fairly sure that a lot of programmers are somewhere along the aspergers index. maybe not enough that anyone's ever noticed, but just enough to change the way their brain works, sufficiently to seperate it from how mine works.

Asbergers does seem to often increase and enhance the mathematical side of the brain.
I mean it does a lot of stuff - but I'd put money that a lot of programmers are on the mathematical side of the condition.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by curious aardvark

The thing about openscad is that at first it looks complicated.

But as long as you break it down into basic shapes. Moving them about and adding and taking them away from each other.
It's actually really easy.

---

Yeah, I know that when I realized that, openSCAD became a lot easier to understand and more "fun" to work with.

On a minor point, working with openSCAD isn't really programming. It is a scripting language that happens to follow some of the syntax of the C programming language. That's the extent of the programming connection. Having done some programming (albeit mostly at a hobby level), every now and then I run into things I could easily do in C but can't in openSCAD. For example, there are no true variables in openSCAD - only fixed constants.

@printbus, I like to use the term assignment as a description in place of variable, to reduce the confusion new users might experience. Of course, the syntax appears to be the same, but as you suggested, it's a constant once it's assigned.

OpenSCAD is a declarative language, which can be confusing for people used to imperative languages like C++, Javascript, and Python. That means that there are no true variables or loops. What looks like variables aren't variable, and what looks like loops are unrolled by OpenSCAD. One good thing about OpenSCAD is that there is a huge amount of example code on the internet. Another good thing is that it is a pretty limited language; there isn't that much to learn compared to other languages.

From a non-programmers point of view - the variables and loops do what I want them to do and are fairly easy to understand :-)

My programming days pretty much started and stopped with BASIC.
and that was 30-40 years ago.
I was pretty good on the zx81, wrote a couple of my own games.
I did have a compiler to put them into machine code. Otherwise they would have too slow to use.

But that was a LONG time ago, I had a lot more brain cells back then ;-)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bobmarray16

I agree that screenshot resolution is very poor

---

That's down to this site. It must be resizing the original 1914 x 1175 JPG. The text is all readable on my PC.

The discussion has moved on since then, but if anyone still wants it here is a direct link:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5lmp9ewkok...tUse.jpg?raw=1

it's a parrot spammer.

They just make comments. Don't try to sell anything.

I'm about 90% certain they are used by the forum owners - and I have no clue who that is - to drive up post numbers to get more advertising revenue.
Anyway that one's gone.

Replying to Post #29

How is it possible to tell to whom a poster is replying, unless by quoting, or stating it explicitly or otherwise making it obvious as I've done here?

Specifically, I'm curious to know what is 'it' in this sentence please; "it's a parrot spammer." ?

I suspect the original post has been deleted. The reference to parrot spammer would imply that the person making the post is simply mimicking a previous post (parroting) without contributing anything to the discussion. "It" in the sentence may be considered a he or a she. My statements are all supposition.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fred_dot_u

I suspect the original post has been deleted. The reference to parrot spammer would imply that the person making the post is simply mimicking a previous post (parroting) without contributing anything to the discussion. "It" in the sentence may be considered a he or a she. My statements are all supposition.

---

Thanks, understood, that makes sense. Naive of me to have treated it as a serious question!